Romania - Online Gambling Intelligence | GamblingCompliance

A poll was recently conducted that asked people around Europe what they consider to be the European Union's greatest accomplishment. A long list of different options were suggested, but despite all these suggestions 17% of European and 29% of British people responded with "none".
Why would they respond with none? Has the European Union really accomplished nothing in their eyes? If so, I would have to agree with them. I took a good look at the different options suggested in the poll and I have to agree with the assessment that the European Union has been a failed project that has not accomplished any goal that I could find myself feeling enthusiastic about.
The different options suggested were as following:
-Peace on the European continent
-Freedom to live & work across the European Union
-Protection of workers' rights
-A European identity
-Removing borders between states
-Influence of Europe in the world
-Support for deprived regions
-Higher standards for consumers
-Democratic values
-Protection of the environment
-The Euro currency
I want to take a look at all of these different options and explain to you why they led me to arrive at the conclusion that the European Union has not accomplished anything noteworthy. Anyone who would rationally look at the above issues would conclude that the European project has not been a cause for celebration.

Peace on the European continent

I don't see the EU as contributing to peace on the European continent. If anything, the EU encourages conflict. The EU sows division and conflict on its borders. In Ukraine, a violent coup was followed by a bloody civil war between Ukrainians who feel more sympathy towards Europe and those in the East who feel more sympathy towards Russia. The free migration of people through Europe has enabled terrorists to enter from Syria, who could proceed to travel to France and kill over a hundred people on a single night. In the Netherlands, marauding Eastern European gangs predate on the local population. The vast income difference between Western and Eastern Europe make criminal activities a viable way of life for people from Eastern Europe whose families live in poverty.
It's human arrogance to imagine we can expect to achieve peace through one political project or another. Peace tends to be a consequence of economic prosperity. Unsustainable economic prosperity however is followed by outbreaks of violence. The Roman empire brought peace to the territories it governed too, until it succumbed under its own weight and marauding bands of barbarians could invade its territory and bring devastation upon its people. If anything, our growing dependence on a single central point of failure makes what would have been a local crisis into a continent-wide one.

Freedom to live & work across the European Union

How is this an accomplishment? Most things that start out as a "right" tend to end up as an obligation. In similar fashion, studying or working abroad is now becoming a rite of passage to prove to the world that you're not white trash. Who benefits exactly from this freedom to work across the European Union? The Dutch truck drivers who are replaced by Romanians who have no means to enforce their labor rights? Eastern European children whose father lives by himself in another country? The freedom to live and work elsewhere takes away our collective bargaining power on a national level. It's thus mostly a kind of freedom useful for corporations.
We're becoming an American society, where families live strewn out across the continent and marriage or death requires us to fly in from remote places. Besides the fact that this is very bad for the environment, it's very bad for our communities. How many elderly people are happy that they never get to see their children because the children live in another country? A society without a sense of community is a society where old people with dementia end up living in nursing homes. Borders are useful and make sense.

Protection of workers' rights

Protection of workers' rights? You mean like the Romanian truck drivers who sleep in their cabin, spend months away from home and earn less than minimum wage? I remember a kid from elementary school whose lifelong dream it was to drive a truck. He didn't last long, because driving a truck is not what it used to be. A century ago, the Standard Oil company would hire workers from various cultures, because the language barrier prohibited them from coordinating a strike. The same thing happens today through the European Union. When we all speak different languages and when employers can look for employees from around the world when locals won't put up with the labor conditions, how are we going to enforce our labor rights as employees?

A European identity

A European identity? Since when? The last time I checked the Greeks were painting Hitler mustaches on portraits of Angela Merkel, German newspapers were depicting the Greeks as inferior Slavs who replaced the ancient Greeks and EU parliamentarians were talking of a two-speed Europe, while Italy and France were hard at work trying to build a Mediterranean Union with Northern African nations. We had a European identity long before we had a European Union, but back then we also had a national and a regional identity.
Today we lost the latter. Local dialects are dying out. Local customs are under threat now that the rest of the world bears witness to them. Everyone feigns outrage over the Dutch dressing up as black people, or the Spanish killing a bull, as millions of animals are stuck in factory farms where they never see actual sunlight. What nobody understands is that culture is exactly those parts of our behavior that the rest of the world considers outrageous. It's not a dish or a flag. Culture can only be preserved through isolation and lack of contact with other groups. When we all mingle, all cultures end up dying out.

Removing borders between states

How is this a good thing exactly? Borders exist for a reason. They came into existence long before we came up with a word for them. Mother Nature calls them "mountain ranges", "oceans", "rivers" or "deserts". They exist to generate diversity. An animal that can survive on one island dies out as soon as other animals are introduced. Visit Socotra and you will find a kind of biodiversity that makes the island look like another planet. Why? Because of borders, that's why. The only places in the Netherlands where you will find old heathen rites are our isolated islands in the Wadden sea. That's where our culture survives, thanks to natural borders.
Removing borders between states and pretending you accomplished something is like proudly looking on as the cats you brought with you on your boat are slaughtering flightless birds on the remote island you visited. Everything that you're spreading already existed before you removed our borders. What went extinct are the things that depend on borders. What depends on borders you might ask? Labor rights in Western Europe. Social safety nets in Scandinavia and other wealthy European nations. What, you think those will last forever? I know a friend of a friend whose Greek mother lives in Greece but collects Dutch unemployment benefits. That's great if you're Greek, but a tremendous economic burden on the Dutch government. Whereas Dutch unemployment benefits would normally end up reinvested in the Dutch economy, now they're reinvested in the Greek economy. As a result, we're now all moving towards American economic policies.

Influence of Europe in the world

The last time I checked, we're the laughing stock of the world. The Turkish government long sought entry into the European Union, because the Turks have tried to prove themselves as European ever since their nomadic ancestors landed in Anatolia. Today, Erdogan is busy removing European words from his language and encourages Turks in Europe to have extra children to replace us. Why? Because everyone pities us. It's not a signal of strength and dominance when your own population refuses to have children and imports people from foreign nations to sustain their society instead.
In cultures where families are important and people take pride in them, people look down on us. What does the rest of the world see when it looks at us? Do they see Vivaldi, the Sistine chapel, Lord Byron? They see Conchita Wurst on the Eurovision song contest, a woman with a beard. Does that make people in Pakistan, Turkey or Saudi Arabia think "we should try to learn from them"? It makes them shut out all Western influence. Reformers there can't point to Europe, they can only state "now I'm not suggesting we should try to be like Europe". If we are what the alternative looks like, they feel as if they have no choice but to cling onto their medieval superstitions at all cost.
If there is anything a symbol of our shared European heritage it is the Christian church, but when the most progressive pope in decades visits the EU parliament, parliamentarians there have to virtue-signal by showing rainbow flags to signal that the Pope is not tolerant enough towards homosexuals. I can honestly think of more examples of the EU undermining European influence, than of the EU exporting European influence to the world. It feels as if we are self-handicapping because we think the rest of the world is no match for us.
Americans could only end up electing an incompetent figure like Donald Trump because of how scared they were of ending up like us. Our response to that is to simply stick our heads in the sand. We laugh when people claim Sweden or Brussels are unsafe. Just smugly giggle it off as your society deteriorates. If anything, I would argue that Europe influences the world, in spite of the European Union. Our religions are still spreading in the third world, our literature is still read by third world people who have not stooped down to our level, in Congo men in dirt-floor shacks still spend a fortune to look the way we did when we were self-confident and successful. We were once so great, that even the European Union is insufficient to make people forget what we could once accomplish.

Support for deprived regions

Oh you mean like Greece, where gym classes are canceled because the hungry children keep fainting. Or you mean like Spain, with its 50% youth unemployment rate? Nothing the EU does for deprived regions could compensate for the fact that the EU forces governments to cut spending during a recession to obey EU norms. The Euro is great for the Netherlands and Germany, but for poorer countries, the ability to devalue their currency and engage in deficit spending would be of tremendous value. The worst thing that ever happened to Greece was joining the European Union. Like most poor countries they want to be a member because it's a status signal obviously, but it's not good for their economy by any means.

Higher standards for consumers

I don't see those higher standards as a good thing per definition. The EU is adamant on ensuring we have high internet speeds and access to Wifi just about anywhere we go. But how is our complete reliance on the Internet a good thing? We don't need high internet speeds, we need a speed limit on the Internet. Similarly, the EU's consumer protection laws are not all so fantastic. In 2008 it was reported that 20% of the British harvest has to be thrown away, because it does not comply with EU regulations. A crooked carrot can't be sold.
What you have to understand is that most of us are not just consumers, we're producers too. Laws that might help us while we're wearing our consumer hat don't help us while we're wearing our producer hat. As an example, a large farmer can more easily adhere to various EU standards around crooked carrots and bended banana's than a small farmer could. Excessive legislation creates advantages of scale for large corporations, at the cost of small corporations. At the same time however we face the worst of both worlds, as pension funds, shady gambling websites and other financial organizations choose to move to countries like Malta and Cyprus with little regulation.

Democratic values

You're kidding right? The EU has a long history of ignoring the will of the people. Whenever we get to vote on their ideas their ideas are rejected. Who can forget the disaster that was the European constitution? It was rejected by France and the Netherlands, but implemented nonetheless under a different name. When the British decided to vote to leave the EU, they were punished with a 100 billion Euro divorce bill. That's what we call blackmail. The EU is a very sore loser.
Finally, there's another point to consider, which is that when democracy was first invented in Greece, it was practiced at the scale of individual cities. It wasn't practiced at the scale of a continent. When you get to vote with your family what to eat for dinner, the result will reflect your own input more than when your whole street has to vote on what to eat for dinner. J. B. S. Haldane noted this problem as early as 1926, in his famous essay On Being the Right Size.
The problem isn't just that the EU is undemocratic, it's that a system of such a scale simply can't be genuinely democratic. It's a system that will inevitably be run by political dynasties, lobbyists and bureaucrats. Look at some other political systems that govern hundreds of millions of people: China, India, the United States, Indonesia. Do any of these look very democratic to you? If I want to see a genuinely democratic nation I look towards Switzerland, where democracy is practiced at a very local level.

Protection of the environment

Wait, are we talking about the same European Union where middle-class people fly to work in Britain from Barcelona because it's cheaper than finding a house in London? How is the EU helping our environment? It makes our problems worse. When the Netherlands implemented a tax on flights, we repealed the tax. Why did we repeal it? Because people went to Belgium to fly. When we implemented a higher tax on petrol, people started filling their tanks in Germany and Belgium.
It's not just the case that the EU doesn't care much about the environment, which it evidently doesn't when its laws lead to British farmers throwing away 20% of their produce. It's the case that globalization inevitably makes our environmental problems worse. You know what would be good for our environment? A family of three generations living together in the same house, working jobs in their own village, buying food grown by locals in their own village, traveling to the farmers market by bicycle and going on vacation to a camping in their own country.
How does having a European Union encourage any of that? It's not just that it doesn't, it's that it can't encourage any of that. An EU-wide currency encourages us to go on vacation abroad, as we don't even have to exchange our money anymore. Some of you might be ecofundamentalists who would happily survive off the food grown in their own garden, but most people blindly follow the economic incentives created by the economy. Free migration encourages us to work jobs in foreign countries, while visiting our family in summer by airplane. If we want to keep a functional environment we have to do everything locally. What European integrations does is cause us to do everything internationally, at enormous scales that require tremendous amounts of energy.

The Euro currency

If you've been paying attention, you'll notice that the accomplishments ascribed to the EU are contradictory. If the EU is good for our environment, then it can't be responsible for higher standards for consumers or the right to work and live in foreign countries. If the EU gives us the freedom to live and work across the European Union, then it can't adequately protect workers' rights. It's great to want to accomplish different things, but you have to consider that a step forward to one destination will inevitably mean a step away from another. So it is with the Euro currency. It takes away the economic autonomy of nation states stuck in very different economic conditions, in exchange for greater ease in economic transactions. It's not hard to see that Greece would benefit from entirely different economic policies at the moment than Germany does. Keep in mind that Greece has had its economy shrink by 25% as a result of the crisis. A crisis might have been inevitable, but its scope was caused entirely by a European Union that feigned surprise whenever the policy of austerity led to "lower than anticipated" economic growth.

Conclusion

The EU hasn't accomplished anything that I genuinely value, because it's an answer to the wrong questions. Rather than asking ourselves how to get what we want, we should have asked ourselves how to be satisfied with less. How do we learn to be happy with crooked carrots, fruit with brown spots and pistachio nuts that occasionally contain a worm? How do we learn to be satisfied with what we have, rather than always wanting more? The EU doesn't answer any of these problems. It wins our hearts by appealing to our most base desires: Fast internet, pretty food, cheap vacations.
You don't have to be a "tokkie" to see the faults inherent to the European Union although it certainly helps. College education and meritocracy cause those of us with an IQ above room temperature to imagine ourselves forever a few cocktail parties away from a prestigious position at an NGO or a government department, as a result we become more than happy to parrot whatever the fashionable talking points of the day happen to be. Very few successful and intelligent people genuinely dare to publicly challenge the neoliberal consensus, not because it's flawless but because it's what you have to believe to get somewhere in life.
The economically disprivileged section of our native European population that doesn't bother parroting whatever happens to be fashionable among the chattering classes does tend to see the faults inherent to the European project. It's a massive elephant in the room that only those who have not been indoctrinated to ignore it still manage to notice. The Dutch equivalent of Joe Sixpack turns on his TV and discovers that the police are on the lookout for Eastern European gangs, or finds out that this job is taken over by an Eastern European who spends months living in his truck. It doesn't take a genius to figure out that this is not in his interest. It takes a creative genius however to come up with rationalizations for the problems.
When you're a young hip fancy liberal with wealthy parents who's studying in college, you don't encounter the negative sides of the European Union. Your parents don't work as a truck driver, a house cleaner, or in a factory. If anything, your parents are used to hiring people to fix their roof, clean their house and unclog their toilet. Your parents do have enough money however to let you spend a year studying abroad in some other country. When you enter your thirties and it's time for you to raise children, you don't do so in our inner cities. You buy a house in a suburban community somewhere, full of enlightened progressives like yourself who started composting to cut down on their carbon footprint. The only migrants your children will encounter there are children of people with full time jobs and as a result you will be unable to understand why "tokkies" and other uneducated right-wing populist xenophobes would insist on stepping out of the European Union.
Britain is now the type of society where bankers can show up to parliament to warn that wages would increase if Britain left the EU without being laughed out of the room. There's a massive disconnect in our society, not so much between the 1% and the 99%, but between the winners and losers of globalism. I should be more specific however: Those who believe themselves to be winners of globalism. If you're a working class kid who's sent off to college, you might mistakenly come to believe that you are one of the many winners of globalism, until you graduate and find yourself forced to earn a living for yourself. Your parents too assume that even though they don't feel safe in their own neighborhood any longer, at least their children will benefit from this project.
In the long term however, we have to recognize that there are no winners of globalism, except for people who don't think more than a few years ahead. Nobody genuinely benefits from a world that's four degree warmer. Everything we built is at risk of being destroyed as a consequence of the lifestyle we lead. The best thing the European Union could do is to work on making itself obsolete. Accept that globalization was a mistake, begin delegating tasks and responsibilities to member states and come up with an exit strategy while we still have time to implement it. It's still possible for the EU to be remembered with sympathy rather than repulsion.

[Table] IAmA: IAm Sheila Norman-Culp, leader of the AP “Dirty Game” investigation into match-fixing in soccer. AMA

Verified? (This bot cannot verify AMAs just yet)
Date: 2013-02-20
Link to submission (Has self-text)
Link to my post

Questions	Answers
Did you see that ludicrous display last night?	I assume u are talking re Arsenal. yes, yes yes. Not as gut-slamming bad as Saturday's disaster against Blackburn, but no fun for sure.
What was the most surprising facet of the story that you discovered?	I was shocked at the Amazonian river of money that sports betting generates... the Interpol chief Ron Noble says several billion euros a year, an ex-FIFA official has said up to $500 billion a year. BILLION...! if you are a criminal mastermind, all you have to do is use some fixed games to deliver a tiny sliver of that and you will be wealthier than you ever imagined. That's about the yearly GNP of Switzerland, no slouch economy.
This is the crazy thing to me, how many people are betting on what are ultimately not high level events. I would like to think that high levels of betting on one side of a small matchup could be observed and regulated.	Until lately, no one thought to look for match-fixing in the soccer wilderness. but extremely low level games in Finland, Norway and Canada that were fixed proved that theory wrong. for fixers, best thing is virgin territory not already claimed by other fixers...
Which mobs were most involved? Turkish? Russian? Romanian?	Prolly the shorter list would be what mobs DON'T want to get involved with match-fixing... AP talked to Turkish commentators who said fixing allegations have cropped up every year for at least 40 years, and even Turkish prosecutors in court documents noted that mobs had infiltrated Turkish soccer since at least 1980... As for Russia, one illegal Asian betting den that an AP reporter visited wouldn't even touch bets for Russia's 2nd division (or Greece's for that matter). Even illegal sites know when to run! Italy's match-fixing has produced over $2.6 billion for the Camorra and the Mafia. And since the vast majority of sports betting money originates in Asia, Asian crime gangs are said to be intimately involved in fixing games.
Where in Asia is the money coming from?	It's coming both from billions of small bettors (betting is a way of life i many Asian countries) and from Asian crime gangs who are recycling dirty money to launder it.
How is the research going on the dinamo zagreb - olimpique game, where olimpique scored just enough goals to kick Ajax out of the champions league?	Ah yes, where a zagreb player winked on a YouTube clip. plenty of suspicions, Ajax started howling immediately, no good evidence ever emerged. was about the same time in which Croatian first league (where dinamo played) was riddled with match-fixing (see our story about Croatia Seveste player Mario Cizmek) but dinamo never implicated in those trials.
To borrow from Grantland's Brian Phillips, "How #*%!ed is the beautiful game?"	It's more &&#$ than top officials want to publicly admit. There are large areas of the world where football has been not only infiltrated by criminals but is being run by criminals. Last year in China, two ex-chiefs of its FA (football association for American fans) got 10 1/2 years in prison for corruption. In 2011, the national TV channel in China REFUSED to broadcast matches from the Chinese League due to widespread match-fixing. I can't imagine the reax here in London if Sky or the BBC refused to broadcast Premier League games...
What is the highest level that you believe some form of match fixing has taken place? European competition? WC qualifying? Where is match fixing most prevalent?	Well, our FIFA correspondent Graham Dunbar says that depends if you include the 1982 World Cup West Germany-Austria game, which appeared to be a deal with the teams. FIFA changed its rules after that so games at the end of rounds start simultaneously. More recently you have the 2010 WC qualifier between Liechtenstein and Finland ... and Latam types will always debate whether the WC 1978 Argentina 6, peru 0 was fixed, sent host Argentina into final...
So...Juventus. As a fan, I just have to know. How involved are they in match fixing? They're always surrounding by rumors of it.	Hmmm. where to start? well, going way back, juventus reputedly bough the ref in the 193 European Cup semifinal, according to one of our top football guys... and they were pretty front and center in Italy's 2006 match-fixing scandal, where they were regulated to Serie B (2nd division), got 9 points deducted, got hit by a massive fine, got stripped of their 2006-07 league titles, got tossed out of the Champions League for a year. Their club president at the time was fined and banned from the sport for five years. Their current coach, Antonio Conte, just got back in December from a 4-month FIFA ban for a separate match-fixing allegation. As Premier Mario Monti said, maybe Italian football should just shut down for a few years to get rid of that corruption thing...
I have to ask. Have you or anyone in your agency been approached or threatened as a result of your investigations?	Gotta give kudos here to Chris Brummett, our Vietnam bureau chief, who visited a Wild West betting boomtown on the border of Cambodia. Going around illegal Asian betting dens, talking with bettors about fixed matches, looking for hints of Asian triad involvement. Not a place that you could take TV cameras or where bettors would let u take a picture, that's for sure. And when I was filming a TV segment at a Zagreb stadium with a player convicted of match-fixing, all of a sudden we saw that a photog with a long lens was zooming in on us. The guy came over to see what we were doing, I made sure not to speak a word of English and our photographer Darko talked to him. After that, Darko said "it's time to go." When a photog who just got back from Syria says its time to go, u go.
Do you think that this type of match fixing also extends into American sports such as Major League Baseball or the National Football League? I think of a game like the Super Bowl with all the money bet on it and I can't help but wonder if games are often fixed or the outcome affected artificially.	Super Bowl betting is big in the US but is tiny in relation to global soccer betting. And the Super Bowl has one big thing that keeps it from being fixed -- very high player salaries. Players in countries like Croatia are match-fixing sometimes for as little as 2500 euros ($3300). Major league baseball salaries and NFL salaries are too high -- and you need to involve too many players to ensure a rock-solid fix. In soccer, the goalie alone has enough influence to fix a game by himself.
Where do the criminal gangs get the action on? Betfair?	For a blow-by-blow account of how it all goes down, check out these links: Player who rues getting involved in match-fixing: Link to apne.ws Unwritten rules of match-fixing: Link to apne.ws
How exactly does it work? The players just play terribly when instructed? The criminals have money on the over?	In terms of the betting, there's about five-six levels of betting in Asia, which leads from local illegal betting shops that deal in cash to next level, regional betting houses, still in cash, to next level, super betting sites, to online betting sites that take credit cards and are openly operating. Asian betting sites don't know their customers, so its easier to disguise large wagers as many small ones. European betting sites know their customers via credit cards, but criminals can use fake credit cards. anyone who knows about a fixed game can bet on whichever betting site offers the odds
Where are most of these criminal organizations based? What country? Are international matches ever fixed(England vs San Marino or something) or just club matches?	Actually 'friendlies' between two nations are a prime target for fixers, because football associations can hire agencies (some of which later turn out to be fronts for fixers) to arrange the games and give a cut of the proceeds (or even bribes) to corrupt FA officials Just imagine, in a friendly you can get world-class talent for free and they can generate gobs of TV revenues. some suspect friendlies in recent times: Nigeria-Argentina 2011, one or more South Africa friendlies right before the World Cup, Bolivia-Latvia 2011, Bulgaria-Estonia 2011, several Latam games involving Venezuela and Bolivia. These are all men's games, so far no whiff of suspicion among women's friendlies.
Is there any suspicion of fixing in women's soccer in the past Olympics? It has bothered a lot of people the way the gold medal game finished. It didn't make any sense at all. Edit: I did mean semi final. My bad.	No, so far no reports of match-fixing in any women's games. in fact, some of the bettors AP interviewed in the illegal Cambodian den were at the time betting on live women's U-20 game between New Zealand and Japan just because they felt it was not fixed.
Has there been any instances when you had suspicion BEFORE a match? What do you think about the recent EUROPOL expose about the 380 european matches? What does only 1 english match (liverpool v debrecen)(albeit english team not involved) say about how things are done in uk v thing elsewhere.what is it that they are doing right/others doing wrong?	Me and another AP reporter have visited a betting monitoring site that runs 31,000 games thru computer models to see if they may be fixed. Companies like that can often see if games are suspicious up to two days before a match _ ie they know if XXX amount bet on a Italian league game is normal or way off. They also keep tabs on 110,000 players, teams, refs and officials and give them match-fixing credit scores... they have seen where a suspicious player changes teams and infects a previously untouched team with his knowlege of fixing... Only one match in England reflects high premier league salaries that protect the players and the game. But bet monitors do have one person on their top 20 'to watch' match-fixing suspicions list that lives in the UK.
What is the best part about your job?	The sheer variety. I mean there are some things we can plan for _ we know when the 2012 London Olympics will start _ but you never know each day what will happen. Will an Icelandic volcano erupt and blow the travel plans of 10 million people to bits? Or maybe a meteor will hit Russia? i am constantly amazed.
How has the series been received by soccefootball officials? It seems to expose some dirty laundry and gotten news and TV pickups across the globe.	Yes, we were very happy with the wide range of media that picked up the stories _ everything from papers in Thailand to ESPN and Sports Illustrated to non-sports outlets like Huffpost and Salon.com.
Which team do you support and who is your favorite player?	Well, i live and work now in north London, so i would be crucified if I didnt keep up with Arsenal (condolences will be accepted here today). Favorite player, hmm. got two. Fernando Torres because i was living in Zurich during Euro 2008 (he was electric then) and he looks just like my hubby did years ago with his freckles; Robin van Persie now because the man just dances on the field, a joy to watch.
Fernando Torres is my favorite too, and believe me he will be electric again! and another question, what is the most memorable match you have ever watched live at a stadium?	At a family level, I brought my ten-year-old daughter and her soccer team to see the American women play at Giants stadium in NJ when the US hosted the Women's World Cup in 1999... Mia Hamm and her buddies really inspired a generation.
Do you see any problem/conflict with betting companies (such as Bwin) being significant sponsors of the game?	Betting companies are always going to advertise next to matches, its the smart operating model for their business. but it is interesting how they can be in severe denial about match-fixing. I went to a London betting conference in Nov, and a top representative from Ladbrokes insisted to me that 'maybe 5-6' games were fixed a year. he claimed that some betting monitoring companies have an incentive to say there are hundreds of possibly fixed games a year just so they would get contracts from FIFA, UEFA, national leagues. On the other hand, his own industry has a HUGE interest in not talking about fixed games -- who is going to bet if they think things are fixed? he did me a big favor though - AP reporters could not get into the monitoring sites until we reported his ludicrous comment to them.
How does it start? Does someone from the criminal organization approach a player in a shady alley? Do players that fix games do so repeatedly? Do multiple players on a team need to be bought to pull off the fix? And finally, how do the criminal organizations actually make money off fixed games? Presumably by placing the bets they've arranged, but don't the people taking their bets get suspicious?	What i'm going to do is give u some link to our stories that explain all this. ironically, match-fixers often groom players just like pedophiles groom targets, according to a major 2012 study on sports corruption. Players can be seduced into fixing by other coaches or players or agents. Or they can be ordered to fix by their corrupt soccer club bosses. Or they can have no idea a game is fixed because the refs were bought off instead. so many ways to match-fix...!
How in the world would FIFA (or possibly another organization) go about fixing this or at least starting to fix it? Is the problem already too deep that anything other than a complete scrub of all teams and parties involved would fail? And could the sport even survive something like that or would it be best for the game if everyone just operated like business as usual?	FIFA's latest anti-match-fixing project is to educate players and refs about the problem. A noble idea, for sure, one that no one can find fault with. but it's kinda like warning your kids not to play with matches when your kitchen is already on fire and that may burn down your whole house. Time to get out the big firehose. Let's not forget how doping has driven sponsors and TV revenues away from cycling or even track. And soccer authorities also have another problem -- their own officials may be the ones driving the fixing. A major sports corruption report last year even gave that a label "chairman-to-chairman" fixing. in turkey last year, 93 people went on trial for match-fixing, and only 14 were players. I think the best model to emulate is germany's, its FA has a omsbudman where players, refs, anyone can call to report fixing worries anonymously.
Is it anyway connected to the fixed cricket games and why is this not getting as much coverage considering soccer is a much larger sport? And do you think the Ireland v France world cup 2010 qualifier was fixed, where Thiery Henry blatantly hand-balled to knock Ireland out of the competition?	That was one darn obvious handball but absolutely no suggestion of fixing in that. as we say in our Dirty Game series, referees and players can perform poorly for all sorts of legitimate reasons. Gotta say, American fans could never stomach bad ref calls like that, that's why they love NFL instant replay. the concept that such a bad call could knock a team out... it's why the NFL had to end its referee lockout...
It's amazing how deep seeded the corruption is in the sport. Do you know how much money was made globally from the match fixing (an estimate)??	FIFA has estimated between $5 billion and $15 billion a year. not chump change.
I think it's more spot-fixing than match-fixing, right? Or at least the higher up the leagues go, the more it deviates towards spot rather than match.	If you got any knowlege of this, let FIFA/UEFA/the national leagues know. AP took a deep dive into fixing in Croatia's first division, (let me tell u google translator is a mess with croatian court transcripts) and found both match and spot fixing in the same games. one sports expert, David Forrest of University of Salford, says that's a great way for gangs to increase revenues, you get to place two-three-four bets on the same fixed game.
Do you think that the punishment for participants should be more severe the further up the ladder the investigation goes? That is, should the first-year first-teamer found to have been involved be given less of a penalty than the national team star? Or should a message be sent with uniform penalties for even the least involvement?	Hmm. it's kinda like doping in that you need zero tolerance. That said, its clear that match-fixers target players like lions on the savannah, picking off the young (easy to manipulate) the old (nearing the end of their employment, fearing what's next) and the weak (those with betting problems or financial difficulties. Young players lured into fixing by older players should get lesser sentences if it's found that they were forced or pressured into it. Older players (or refs hitting age limits) should get harsher penalties because they absolutely knew what they were doing. national stars who fix bring shame upon an entire nation but the fixing penalities should be the same no matter what the league.
Do you feel like, historically, there has been more corruption in Italian leagues, or is it more a matter of the Italian investigations being more frequent and successful in revealing the corruption and making cases stick?	There's no question that Italy has had repeated, major match-fixing instances at least since 2005. And each case seems to bring new amazing allegations. My all time favorite is the goalie who wanted to fix a game, so he drugs the water bottles of his teammates to play poorly. they stink, lose the game, and one even crashes his car afterward. Since Italy takes drunk driving quite seriously, the driver gets a blood test which shows he is full of sedatives, and the whole fixing operation is unveiled. can't make this up. I give plenty of kudos to Italian prosecutor Roberto Di Martino but the country has had plenty of corruption issues in all walks of life ... , so i dont think we can just credit good prosecutors for us hearing about italian match-fixing
At what point do you as an organisation decide that you will look into that matter. How did this all start - or better yet, what event triggered this investigation?	We noticed that AP was doing about a dozen match-fixing spot stories around the world a month... but it was country by country. This trial, that arrest, this investigation. It was time to look at the whole of the sport, something that fits an international news agency better than a local or national paper. I had been interested in match-fixing since i covered FIFA for AP in 2007-2008 and did a story when they first set up their EWS monitoring site. got promoted to London, distracted by volcanos and a wonderful London Olympics, but began interviewing people last june.
Glad to oblige blatter? ^{just^kidding.}	What i should have said yesterday -- this AMA is about match-fixing, not Blatter. Blatter is such a vast topic that he needs a whole 'nuther forum. Maybe ask him to come on himself.
How do you stop match fixing?	Whoever figures that out gets a nobel peace prize.
Do you have any knowledge of match fixing in Latin America? Specifically Libertadores Cup and Brazilian and Argentinian national leagues?	Bolivia and Venezuela have had several suspicious friendlies, Guatemala had 3 players banned in recent months for fixing.
What do you have to say about one of the most outrageous things that happened in the last decade: Lyon 7-1 Zagreb leaving Ajax out of CL? Everyone seems to have forgotten about that thing and no one ever really talked or investigate that game further.	That is certainly the one game that Europeans came away thinking must be fixed. it would be a great subject for a magzine piece. maybe when everyone in that game has retired, more might come out.
Which league do you believe to be the most corrupt? Even if it isn't one you've investigated.	Impossible to say. too many candidates.
My dad used to bet on soccer matches with his buddies frequently, and pointed out how he would know if a match is fixed or not depending on the players' reactions during a penalty kick. Apparently, whenever a player looks backwards before taking a penalty, he is always looking for a signal as to whether or not he is allowed to make the goal. Is there any merit to this conspiracy theory that my dad and his friends developed?	Wild theory, too bad it's prolly not true -- they must have been drinking pretty heavily! If a game is fixed by players, they know beforehand and they know exactly what marks they need to hit: X-X score at halftime, X-X final result, X goal differential. No need to look over their shoulder, they already know if they should make it or not. If the game is fixed by club officials, they have already told their players what to do. If the game is fixed by referees, often players don't even know. They might think it's a ridiculous penalty call but they are not going to hurt their stats, they are going to try to make the penalty.
Who's going to win the European Cup?	Going to leave all game analysis to commentators and Match of the Day boys. I'm just all about corruption.
Are there times when two different groups try to fix a match with conflicting goals?	This was a significant problem in Asia, and its a terrible business model when two crime gangs are trying to fix the same game. That propeled at least Asian gangs to seek out more European games, which were considered several years ago to be much cleaner. One monitor told me about a match in which his company's spotters at the game saw thugs from two different crime gangs shouting with the ref at halftime. Only one side won. (think the ref in that case had a death wish or was just blinded by greed)
What is the most common betting market on fixed games? A straight win? or something like over 2.5 goals? Or even corners or number of cards? Do you bet on any games?	I don't bet on sports, not after seeing all this...! The most common bets on fixed games are four things: final score, half-time score, total number of scores and score differential. who is taking the corner doesnt bring in enough money...
Where does the actual money the gangs win come from? Is straight from the betting agencies pockets?	David Forrest, the UK economist who specializes in sports betting, tells us that fixed sports betting is a fabulous way to launder money. You take cash from drug or trafficking operations, you bet on fixed games, not only do u make a profit but dirty money comes back clean. He says some crime gangs are trying to buy soccer clubs just to launder money through them.
Was the Qatar bid for hosting the 2022 world cup involved in bribery of any kind?	Sri, this AMA is on match-fixing. The FIFA decision to give the 2018 and 2022 World Cups to Russia and Qatar respectively is a whole separate (and vast) discussion.
Did your investigation have any overlap with Declan Hill's investigations in the past?	Declan is a pioneer, kudos to him. Suggest everyone interested in this topic read his book "The Fix: Organized Crime and Soccer"
a comment: Kudos to you and your team for really doing some real investigative journalism. Too much TMZ-style or reactive news these days so it's refreshing to see some real shit. Second my question: I saw the amount of profit gained from this scheme was a seemingly paltry $11m. In 2012, $94m was bet on the Super Bowl alone. Is the $11m as truly insignificant as it appears? What percentage of the pie is legitimate vs illegitimate?	You maybe are just looking at one Italian match-fixing investigation. Multiply that by investigations in 50 nations last year, add to it all the bribe money that is linked to organizing friendlies that can generate big TV revenue... the point about match-fixing is not illegal or legal betting. It is tainting all betting with a fix. European betting agencies pride themselves on their legality, but anyone can be undermined by a fix. In asia, illegal gambling dens thrive because gambling in an ingrained cultural habit that is going to occur even if govts ban it.
Does this only happen with football? are there stories of match fixing happening in the European basketball, volleyball, handball, water polo leagues?	All sports can be vulnerable to match-fixing, especially if there is betting on them. add tennis, cricket, horse racing to that mix.
I don't really understand soccer but how and what makes a game suspicious?	Huge amounts of late bets on an obscure game. In-game live betting in which lots of bettors put money on another goal and the referee orders a penalty for an unfathomable reason. Games in which all scoring is due to penalty kicks. Games in which scoring is so high that it looks more like baseball. Games in which many goals are disqualified for offsides. so many options i just cant list them all
Does anyone know if Domenico Cricito is still being investigated or if they've finished with him?	Cricito, an Italian defender who plays for the St. Petersburg club Zenit, was cleared, not charged with any match-fixing. He has said that he's trying not to be angry but still is about how he was dropped from the Italian team playing in Euro 2012 due to allegations that turned out to be unproven.
How are investigations going in regard to serie a? i know the mafias in Italy have a lot of control over players and referees.	Big break on Thursday (feb 21, day after this AMA). a top suspected fixer was arrested by Italian police, Admir Sulijic. he reportedly has links to singapore money man Dan Tan. --- Big break on Friday, Dan Tan being interviewed by Singapore police!!!
Is there a chance Chelsea has been involved with match fixing please say no?	I'm such a cynic that I can't say 'No' about any team. To paraphrase Donald Rumsfeld, that's a 'known unknown' -- we know there are some things we do not know. that applies to all teams, not just Chelsea.
Have there been any murders or serious crimes committed in the name of covering up max fixing?	In Bulgaria, over a dozen soccer officials have been slain over the last decade. and the crime gangs there don't even pretend to make it look like an accident, they just gun people down in the street.
Due to the nature of your work, do you ever feel in danger?	Our medical writer tells us that sitting at a computer for hours on end is the most deadly thing for reporters. if she's right, we are all doomed.
Which top leagues would you say are the least corrupt?	Certainly the premier league, due to the players' huge salaries.
Why do FIFA or UEFA never step in to take action on the obviously corrupt English FA, more specifically, Referee's decisions going heavily in the way of a certain Alex Ferguson? There is plenty of evidence, but you just leave them to get away with it. Why?	Gotta say, FIFA and UEFA are clearly not fans of the English FA and are certainly not favoring them in any way re refereeing decisions.
I like how this question is dodged.	Glad to oblige.
Please tell me the Celtic v Barcelona game wasn't fixed! I have to be sure...	Hey even amazing teams lose sometimes! Plus this doesnt match the typical M.O. of the most successful match-fixers. When great teams lose, it always raises more suspicions among bet monitoring companies than when bad teams lose (our reporters visited some secret betting monitoring sites). A convicted midfielder who talked to us about match-fixing says it's always better to simply have bad teams lose once again -- criminals just pre-determine HOW MUCH that team will lose by and play those odds.
Whoever figures that out gets a nobel peace prize.	Sri don't mean to be flippant. You go for zero tolerance, you establish anti-match-fixing officials in every national league, you teach players and refs and soccer officials how to recognize approaches by fixers, you increase criminal penalities for fixing, you don't stop investigating serious allegations just because a referee has retired 'from the football family,' (FIFA) you protect whistleblowers better. Italian defender Simone Farina told police about being approached by a fellow player to fix, and that effectively ended his playing career and made him a pariah in italy...happily months and months later Aston Villa made him a 'community coach'
No question, but thanks for doing what you do. This kind of high quality investigative journalism is what the free press is all about.	Very kind to hear. are we related? jk. hope you got a chance to read, watch or hear all the eight Dirty Game stories, three sidebars, online video, broadcast video, radio reports, etc.
What's amazing is how ESPN hasn't said a word about this yet. Because they'd rather show more Tim Tebow praying coverage, or Mark Sanchez picking his asshole coverage, or LeBron James changing shampoo types coverage, or Erin Andrews trimming her fingernails coverage.	ESPN online did pick up the AP Dirty Game story... and they did a video piece after Europol cited 680 suspicious games. but on that video piece they got an Italian soccer commentator who thought this was being overblown...
Could you please investigate the NBA now pls.	Hmm. I saw an NBA rep at the London conference on sports betting. the major difference, obviously, is the huge number of scores in basketball and low number of scores in soccer. 1-0 wins a soccer game, but you need what, 35-50 scores to win an NBA game? So many more scoring variables in the NBA and such high salaries. I would think college ball (no salaries) would be much much more vulnerable to spread fixing.
I am Sheila Norman-Culp, AP’s Assistant Editor for Europe, who led the AP's “Dirty Game” multiformat team that investigated match-fixing in football. FTFY.	Ahh, you say football, i say tomato. Let's call a truce. Otherwise Americans in this chat will start talking about Alabama

Last updated: 2013-02-25 02:10 UTC
This post was generated by a robot! Send all complaints to epsy.

[Hiring] - Danish Speaking Customer Support

romanian gambling regulator video

Having received accreditation from the Romanian gambling regulator (ONJN), Habanero can now expand its footprint into another new territory. Online gambling has been legal and regulated in Romania since 2016. It means that Romanian operators can now offer their players Habanero’s entire portfolio of games, which number roughly 70, including the popular slots Wizards Want War!, Egyptian Covid-19 pandemic has set back the Romanian gambling industry by five years, according to the data from the National Institute of Statistics (INS). The Romanian gambling operators experienced one of the most severe declines of the last 30 years between March and May this year. The local gambling and entertainment industry fell by about […] Habanero has been given the green light by the Romanian gambling regulator to supply operators across the country with its slots and table games portfolio. By receiving an accreditation from the ONJN, Habanero will supply its games offering, which includes titles such as Wizards Want War!, Egyptian Lithuanian Regulator Requests Powers For Website, Payment Blocking. 25th Nov 2019. Eastern Europe Enjoying Brief Window Of Regulatory Stability, Say Experts. 20th Nov 2019. See all. Regulatory Research. Interactive Map: Gambling Advertising Across Europe . Advertising is one of the most hotly discussed topics in the European gambling industry. In this map, VIXIO GamblingCompliance shows the Answer: The authorization/organization of the activity of gambling in Romania is governed by State monopoly. The State can grant the right of setting up the activity of games of chance, according to Romanian gambling laws, on the basis of a license, for the organization of each type of games of chance. The games of chance are classified as follows: Moreover, pursuant to GEO no. 77/2009, the Romanian regulator must also: (i) identify websites used for carrying out marketing, advertising and publicity activities, or any other promotional activities relating to unlicensed online gambling; and (ii) communicate all information identified to the ISPs, so that access to these websites and unlicensed gambling websites can be blocked. In addition, the regulator shall communicate the information about the unlicensed gambling websites to the A Romanian parliamentarian has hit out at the country’s gambling regulator, criticising the measures which are currently in place to prevent unauthorised betting. Dumitru Mihalescul has challenged the head of the National Office for Gambling to provide answers to three official parliamentary questions, addressing how the industry operates. General support for gambling As a member […]